1. Tramontano, A. The Ten Most Wanted Solutions in Protein Bioinformatics /
2. A. Tramontano. - Boca Raton : Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2005. - 216 p.
3. Lensink, M.F. Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009 / M.F. Lensink,
4. S.J. Wodak // Proteins. - 2010. - Vol. 78, № 15. - P. 3073-3084.
5. The performance of ZDOCK and ZRANK in rounds 6-11 of CAPRI / K. Wiehe [et al.] //
6. Proteins. - 2007. - Vol. 69. - P. 719-725.
7. Schneidman-Duhovny, D. Automatic prediction of protein interactions with large scale motion / D. Schneidman-Duhovny, R. Nussinov, H. Wolfson // Proteins. - 2007. - Vol. 69. - P. 764-773.
8. PIPER: an FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials / D. Kovakov
9. [et al.] // Proteins. - 2006. - Vol. 65. - P. 392-406.
10. Kowalsman, N. Inherent limitations in protein-protein docking procedures / N. Kowalsman, M. Eisenstein // Bioinformatics. - 2007. - Vol. 23. - P. 421-426.
11. Lu, L. MULTIPROSPECTOR: an algorithm for the prediction of protein-protein interactions
12. by multimeric threading / L. Lu, H. Lu, J. Skolnick // Proteins. - 2002. - Vol. 49. - P. 350-364.
13. Kundrotas, P.J. Predicting 3d structures of transient protein_protein complexes by homology / P.J. Kundrotas, E. Alexov // Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. - 2006. - Vol. 1764. - P. 1498-1511.
14. Fast and accurate modeling of protein-protein interactions by combining template-interfacebased docking with flexible refinement / N. Tuncbag [et al.] // Proteins. - 2012. - Vol. 80. - P. 1239 - 1249.
15. A structural perspective on protein-protein interactions / R. Russel [et al.] // Curr Opin
16. Struct Biol. - 2004. - Vol. 14. - P. 313-324.
17. Sinha, R. Docking by structural similarity at protein-protein interfaces / R. Sinha,
18. P. Kundrotas, I. Vakser // Proteins. - 2010. - Vol. 78. - P. 3235-3241.
19. Vreven, T. Integrating atom-based and residue-based scoring functions for protein-protein docking / T. Vreven, H. Hwang, Z. Weng // Protein Science. - 2011. - Vol. 20. - P. 1576-1586.
20. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and
21. side-chain conformations / J.J. Gray [et al.] // J. Mol. Biol. - 2003. - Vol. 331, № 1. - P. 281-299.
22. FireDock: a web server for fast interaction re-nement in molecular docking / E. Maschiach
23. [et al.] // Nucleic Acids Res. - 2008. - Vol. 36. - P. W229-W232.
24. Fernandez-Recio, J. ICM-DISCO docking by global energy minimization with fully flexible
25. side-chains / J. Fernandez-Recio, M. Totrov, R. Abagyan // Proteins. - 2003. - Vol. 52. - P. 113-117.
26. Dominguez, C. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical
27. and/or biophysical information / C. Dominguez, R. Boelens, A. Bonvin // J. Am. Chem. Soc. - 2003. - Vol. 125. - P. 1731-1737.
28. Kozakov, D. Discrimination of near-native structures in protein-protein docking by testing the stability of local minima / D. Kozakov, O. Schueler-Furman, S. Vajda // Proteins. - 2008. - Vol. 72. - P. 993-1004.
29. Pierce, B. A combination of rescoring and refinement significantly improves protein
30. docking performance / B. Pierce, Z. Weng // Proteins. - 2008. - Vol. 72. - P. 270-279.
31. Lorenzen, S. Monte Carlo refinement of rigid-body protein docking structures with backbone displacement and side-chain optimization / S. Lorenzen, Y. Zhang // Proteins. - 2007. - Vol. 16. - P. 2716-2725.
32. Cavasotto, C. Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes / C. Cavasotto, J. Kovacs, R. Abagyan // J. Am. Chem. Soc. - 2005.- Vol. 127. - P. 9632-9640.
33. Fiorucci, S. Binding site prediction and improved scoring during flexible protein-protein
34. docking with ATTRACT / S. Fiorucci, M. Zacharias // Proteins. - 2010. - Vol. 78. - P. 3131-3139.
35. Kastritis, P. Are scoring functions in protein-protein docking ready to predict interactomes? Clues from a novel binding affinity benchmark / P. Kastritis, A. Bonvin // J. Proteome Res. - 2010. - Vol. 9. - P. 2216-2225.
36. A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes / C. Zhang [et al.] // J. Med. Chem. - 2005. - Vol. 48. - P. 2325-2335.
37. Scoring by intermolecular pairwise propensities of exposed residues (SIPPER): A new efficient potential for protein-protein docking / C. Pons [et al.] // J. Chem. Inf. Model. - 2011. - Vol. 51. - P. 370-377.
38. Shen, M. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures / M. Shen, A. Sali // Protein Science. - 2006. - Vol. 15. - P. 2507-2524.
39. Liu, S. DECK: Distance and environment-dependent, coarse-grained, knowledge-based potentials for protein-protein docking / S. Liu, I. Vakser // BMC Bioinformatics. - 2011. - Vol. 12. - P. 280-286.
40. Pierce, B. ZRANK: Reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function / B. Pierce, Z. Weng // PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. - 2007. - Vol. 67. - P. 1078-1086.
41. Betts, M. An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: implications for predictive docking / M. Betts, M. Sternberg // Protein Eng. - 1999. - Vol. 12. - P. 271-289.
42. Zacharias, M. Accounting for conformational changes during protein-protein docking /
43. M. Zacharias // Curr Opin Struct Biol. - 2010. - Vol. 20, № 2. - P. 180-186.
44. Ding, F. Rapid flexible docking using a stochastic rotamer library of ligands / F. Ding,
45. S. Yin, N.V. Dokholyan // J. Chem. Inf. Model. - 2010. - Vol. 50, № 9. - P. 1623-1632.
46. Principles of flexible protein-protein docking / N. Andrusier [et al.] // Proteins. - 2008. -
47. Vol. 73, № 2. - P. 271-289.
48. Zhang, Y. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality / Y. Zhang, J. Skolnick // Proteins. - 2004. - Vol. 57. - P. 702-710.
49. Dockground system of databases for protein recognition studies: Unbound structures for docking / Y. Gao [et al.] // Proteins. - 2007. - Vol. 69, № 4. - P. 845-851.
50. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures /
51. R. Menndez [et al.] // Proteins. - 2005. - Vol. 60. - P. 150-169.
52. Kolodny, R. Approximate protein structural alignment in polynomial time / R. Kolodny,
53. N. Linial // PNAS. - 2004. - Vol. 101. - P. 12201-12206.
54. Kabsch, W.A. A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors / W.A. Kabsch // Acta Cryst. - 1976. - Vol. 32. - P. 922-923.
55. Horn, R. Matrix Analysis / R. Horn, C. Johnson. - Cambridge University Press, 1985.
56. Protein-protein docking benchmark 2.0: an update / J. Mintseris [et al.] // Proteins. - 2005. - Vol. 60. - P. 214-216.
Послать статью по эл. почте 