On optimization of the mixed charging infrastructure of electric buses for urban routes
https://doi.org/10.37661/1816-0301-2022-19-2-68-84
Abstract
Objectives. When transition from a fleet of diesel buses to a fleet of electric buses, it is important to optimize the charging infrastructure, which combines the slow-charging technologies at the depot overnight and fast recharging at the terminals of the routes. The purpose of the study is to create models and methods for developing the cost-effective solutions for selecting this type of charging infrastructure for a fleet of electric buses serving the city route system, taking into account a number of specific conditions. The operation of the fleet and charging infrastructure is modeled both for the depot at night and for the terminal stops in the most representative period of the day, characterized by the highest intensity of passenger traffic and maximum power consumption.
Methods. Methods of set theory, graph theory and linear approximation are used.
Results. A mathematical model has been developed for the problem of optimizing a mixed-type charging infrastructure for an electric bus fleet. The total daily cost of charging stations, degradation of electric bus batteries and consumed electricity was chosen as the objective function. The model is formulated as a mixed integer linear programming problem.
Conclusion. To solve the formulated problem, standard solvers like IBM ILOG CPLEX can be used. The solution of the problem lies in the choice of durations and schedules for charging electric buses at low-capacity charging stations in the depot at night and at high-capacity charging stations of terminal stops in a given range of peak hours.
About the Authors
B. M. RozinBelarus
Boris M. Rozin, Ph. D. (Eng.), Head of the Sector
st. Surganova, 6, Minsk, 220012, Belarus
I. A. Shaternik
Belarus
Ilya A. Shaternik, Engineer-programmer
st. Surganova, 6, Minsk, 220012, Belarus
References
1. Gao Z., Lin Z., LaClair T. J., Liu C., Li J.-M., …, Ward J. Battery capacity and recharging needs for electric buses in city transit service. Energy, 2017, vol. 122, pp. 588–600.
2. Olsson O., Grauers A., Pettersson S. Method to analyze cost effectiveness of different electric bus systems. EVS29 International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, June 2016. Montreal, 2016, pp. 1–12.
3. Lin Z. Optimizing and diversifying electric vehicle driving range for US drivers. Transportation Science, 2014, vol. 48(4), pp. 635–650.
4. Pelletier S., Jabali O., Mendoza J. E., Laporte G. The electric bus fleet transition problem. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Techonologies, 2019, vol. 109, pp. 174–193.
5. Goehlich D., Fay T.-A., Park S. Conceptual design of urban e-bus systems with special focus on battery technology. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), Delft, The Netherlands, 5–8 August 2019. Delft, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.289
6. Han S. K. A practical battery wear model for electric vehicles charging applications. Applied Energy, 2014, vol. 113, pp. 1100–1108.
7. Guschinsky N., Kovalyov M., Rozin B., Brauner N. Fleet and charging infrastructure decisions for fast-charging city electric bus service. Computers and Operations Research, 2021, vol. 135, р. 105449. https://doi.org/:10.1016/j.cor.2021.105449
8. Rogge M., van der Hurk E., Larsen A., Sauer D. U. Electric bus fleet size and mix problem with optimization of charging infrastructure. Applied Energy, 2018, vol. 211, pp. 282–295.
9. Millner A. Modeling lithium ion battery degradation in electric vehicles. 2010 IEEE Conference on Innovative Technologies for an Efficient and Reliable Electricity Supply. Waltham, MA, 2010, pp. 349–356.
10. Pelletier S., Jabali O., Laporte G. Charge scheduling for electric freight vehicles. Transportation Research Part B, 2018, vol. 115, pp. 246–269.
Review
For citations:
Rozin B.M., Shaternik I.A. On optimization of the mixed charging infrastructure of electric buses for urban routes. Informatics. 2022;19(2):68-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37661/1816-0301-2022-19-2-68-84