Website Quality Evaluation Methodology Universal Star: 1st point – “Content”
https://doi.org/10.37661/1816-0301-2020-17-3-95-112
Abstract
The Internet continues to grow at a fast pace with over 1.5 billion websites in 2019 as compared with only one in 1991. The emergence of enormous websites of various complexities and types makes assessing the quality of these sites a vastly important, difficult and complicated task. With this concern, the current paper proposes a novel approach for website assessment by developing a new Website Quality Evaluation Methodology Universal Star (WQEMUS) with a theoretical and empirical basis. It became possible through the employment of the grounded theory methodology that enables relevant concepts to emerge from data. To improve the reliability and validity of the findings, an extensive literature review, in-depth and qualitative interviews, and a user evaluation survey were conducted and associated together. In this way, the study presents the results of the selection and categorization of generic quality attributes for WQEMUS with a three-tier structure, consisting of top-level quality criteria, sub-criteria and indicators. These quality dimensions are grounded on a combination of subjective and objective indicators. Consequently, WQEMUS becomes capable of estimating a wide range of different websites irrespective of domain affiliation and services they provide, including Web 3.0 sites.
About the Author
S. G. Abduganiev
Khujand Polytechnic Institute of Tajik Technical University;
Johannes Kepler University Linz
Tajikistan
Tajikistan
Siddikjon G. Abduganiev obtained his Engineering with honors from the Khujand branch of the Technological University of Master’s Degree of Science in Systems Tajikistan (KBTUT) in 2007, Khujand city, Tajikistan. Until 2012, after university graduation, he has worked as an Assistant Professor in KBTUT and the Khujand Polytechnic Institute of the Tajik Technical University (KPITTU) in the departments of Computer Programming and Information Technologies and Higher Mathematics and Informatics, respectively. At the present time, he is pursuing a Ph.D. degree in Business Informatics at the Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
References
1. Internet World stats. (2019) Total number of websites. http://www.internetlivestats.com/total-number-of-websites.
2. Netcraft Ltd. (May 2019) How many active sites are there? https://news.netcraft.com/archives/2019/05/10/may-2019-web-server-survey.html.
3. S. Cimino and F. Micali, “Web q-model: A new approach to the quality,” in Proceedings of the 26th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2008, florence, Italy.
4. S. Murugesan, “Web application development: Challenges and the role of web engineering,” in WebEngineering: Modelling and Implementing Web Applications, G. Rossi, O. Pastor, D. Schwabe, and L. Olsina, Eds. London: Springer, 2008, pp. 7–32.
5. H. Sørum, R. Medaglia, and K. Andersen, “Assessment of website quality: Scandinavian web awards right on track?” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Electronic Government, Linz, Austria, August 31 - September 3. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 198–209.
6. M. Herczeg and H. Kritzenberger, “A task and scenario based analysis model for user-centred systems,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 2001, pp. 229–235.
7. Z. Zhou, H. Zhou, and H. Yang, “Evaluating websites using a practical quality model,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automation and Computing Society, September 2008, west London, England.
8. Z. Zhou, “Evaluating websites using a practical quality model,” Master’s thesis, De Montfort University, 2009.
9. G. Malak, H. Sahraoui, L. Badri, and M. Badri, “Modeling web quality using a probabilistic approach: An empirical validation,” ACM Transactions on the Web, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–31, 2010.
10. S. G. Abduganiev, M. Pils, and F. Roithmayr, “Elicitation of criteria weights for the web quality evaluation method universal star: By using different ranking methods,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Scientific–Practical Conference. Scientific Publishing Center "Discovery", 12-13 April 2016, pp. 11–24.
11. J. Hartmann, A. De Angeli, and A. Sutcliffe, “Framing the user experience: Information biases on website quality judgement,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2008, pp. 855–864.
12. M. Epner, “Poor project management of number-one problem of outsourced e-projects,” Reseach Briefs, 2000, cutter Consortium and others.
13. J. Offutt, “Quality attributes of web software applications,” IEEE Software, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 25–32,
14.
15. C. H. Thayer, “Automation and the problems of management,” Vital Speeches of the Day, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 121–125, 1958.
16. X. Dreze and F. Zufryden, “Testing web site design and promotional content,” Journal of Advertising Research, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 77–91, 1997.
17. A. Stefani and M. Xenos, “E-commerce system quality assessment using a model based on iso 9126 and belief networks,” Software Quality Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 107–129, March 2008.
18. C. Moraga, M. Moraga, C. Calero, and A. Caro, “Square-aligned data quality model for web portals,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Quality Software, Jeju, Korea. IEEE Computer Society, 24-25 August 2009, pp. 117–122.
19. M. Herrera, M. Á. Moraga, I. Caballero, and C. Calero, “Quality in use model for web portals (qiuwep),” in International Conference on Web Engineering. Springer, 2010, pp. 91–101.
20. ISO/IEC, ISO 9126-1:2001 Software Engineering–Product Quality: Quality model. International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission, 2001, vol. 1.
21. ——, “Iso/iec cd 9126-1:1997, software quality characteristics and metrics - part 1: Quality characteristics and sub-characteristics,” 1997, international Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission.
22. ——, “Iso/iec 25000:2005 software and system engineering–software product quality requirements and evaluation (square)–guide to square,” 2005, international Organization for Standardization.
23. ——, ISO-IEC 25010: 2011 Systems and Software Engineering-Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE)-System and Software Quality Models. International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission, 2011.
24. J. Nielsen, “A home-page overhaul using other web sites,” IEEE Software, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 75–78, 1995.
25. W. M. Cheung and W. Huang, “An investigation of commercial usage of the world wide web: A picture from singapore,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 377–388, 2002.
26. L. Olsina and G. Rossi, “Measuring web application quality with web-qem,” IEEE Multimedia, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 20–29, 2002.
27. C. Calero, J. Ruiz, and M. Piattini, “Classifying web metrics using the web quality model,” Online Information Review, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 227–248, 2005.
28. S. Abrahao and E. Insfran, “Early usability evaluation in model driven architecture environments,” in Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Quality Software. IEEE Computer Society, 2006, pp. 287–294.
29. A. Seffah, M. Donyaee, R. B. Kline, and H. K. Padda, “Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model,” Software Quality Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 159–178, 2006.
30. L. Mich, M. Franch, and G. Cilione, “The 2qcv3q quality model for the analysiy of web site requirements,” Journal of Web Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1-2, pp. 115–127, 2003.
31. L. Mich, M. Franch, and L. Gaio, “Evaluating and designing web site quality,” IEEE MultiMedia, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 34–43, 2003.
32. L. Hasan and E. Abuelrub, “Assessing the quality of web sites,” INFOCOMP Journal of Computer Science, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 11–20, 2008.
33. R. Polillo, “Quality models for web [2.0] sites: A methodological approach and a proposal,” in Current Trends in Web Engineering (ICWE 2011). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, A. Harth and N. Koch, Eds. Springer, 2011, vol. 7059, pp. 251–265.
34. Á. Rocha, “Framework for a global quality evaluation of a website,” Online Information Review, vol. 36,no. 3, pp. 374–382, 2012.
35. A. L. Strauss, Qualitative analysis for social scientists. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
36. A. Straus and J. Corbin, Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.
37. New York: SAGE, 1990.
38. A. Strauss and J. Corbin, “Grounded theory methodology,” in Handbook of Qualitative Research, N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, Eds., 1994, vol. 17, pp. 273–85, thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. ——, Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1998.
40. K. Charmaz, “Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research,” London: SAGE, 2006.
41. A. M. Aladwani and P. C. Palvia, “Developing and validating an instrument for measuring userperceived web quality,” Information & Management, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 467–476, 2001.
42. G. Gledec, “Quality model for the world wide web,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Telecommunications-(ConTEL), 2005a, pp. 162–166.
43. ——, “Evaluating web site quality,” in Proceedings of the 7th Internet Users Conference (CUC2005),
44. b, croatia.
45. J. Nielsen, Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. New Riders Publishing, 1999.
46. E. Grose, C. Forsythe, and J. Ratner, “Using web and traditional style guides to design web interfaces,” Human Factors and Web Development, pp. 121–131, 1998.
47. P. Vora, “Human factors methodology for designing web sites,” in Human Factors and Web development, E. Grose, C. Forsythe, and J. Ratner, Eds. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998, pp. 153–172.
48. ——, Web application design patterns. Morgan Kaufmann, 2009.
49. I. Y. Melody, S. R. Rashmi, and H. A. Marti, “Empirically validated web page design metrics,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2001, pp. 53–60.
50. C. Ranganathan and S. Ganapathy, “Key dimensions of business-to-consumer web sites,” Information & Management, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 457–465, 2002.
51. V. Moustakis, C. Litos, A. Dalivigas, L. Tsironis et al., “Website quality assessment criteria,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Information Quality. Boston: MIT, 5–7 November 2004, pp. 59–73.
52. W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, “Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable,” Information Systems Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 60–95, 1992.
53. A. Molla and P. S. Licker, “E-commerce systems success: An attempt to extend and respecify the delone and maclean model of is success,” Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 131–141, 2001.
54. P. Zhang and M. Gisela, “User expectations and rankings of quality factors in different web site domains,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 9–33, 2002.
55. A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry, “A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research,” Journal of Marketing, pp. 41–50, 1985.
56. P. Zhang and G. Von Dran, “Expectations and rankings of web site quality features: Results of two studies on user perceptions,” in Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2001.
57. J. Ruiz, C. Calero, and M. Piattini, “A three dimensional web quality model,” in International Conference on Web Engineering. Springer, 2003, pp. 384–385.
58. R. Polillo, Il check-up dei siti web. Apogeo Editore, 2004.
59. O. Signore, “A comprehensive model for web sites quality,” in Proceedings of WSE2005 - 7th IEEE International Symposium on Web Site Evolution. IEEE, 2005, pp. 30–36.
60. Á. Moraga, C. Calero, and M. Piattini, “Comparing different quality models for portals,” Online Information Review, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 555–568, 2006.
61. J. Mills, A. Bonner, and K. Francis, “The development of constructivist grounded theory,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–10, March 2006.
62. J. Heimlich, “Evaluating the content of web sites,” Environmental Education and Training Partnership Resource Library, Ohio State University Extension, 1999.
63. R. Benbunan-Fich, “Using protocol analysis to evaluate the usability of a commercial web site,” Information & Management, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 151–163, 2001.
64. J. Cox and B. G. Dale, “Key quality factors in web site design and use: An examination,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 862–888, 2002.
65. M. Koufaris, “Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior,” Information Systems Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 205–223, 2002.
66. E. T. Loiacono, R. T. Watson, D. L. Goodhue et al., “Webqual: A measure of website quality,” Marketing Theory and Applications, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 432–438, 2002.
67. C. Osborne and J. Rinalducci, “Evaluation of web based resources within the art history discipline,” University of North Carolina, Tech. Rep., 2002.
68. W. H. Delone and E. R. McLean, “The delone and mclean model of information systems success: A ten-year update,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 9–30, 2003.
69. F. B. Tan and L. L. Tung, “Exploring website evaluation criteria using the repertory grid technique: A web designers’ perspective,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS, 2003, pp. 65–69, seattle, WA.
70. H. Van der Heijden, T. Verhagen, and M. Creemers, “Understanding online purchase intentions: Contributions from technology and trust perspectives,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 41–48, March 2003. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000445
71. O. Lin and D. Joyce, “Critical success factors for online auction web sites,” Proceedings of the 17th NACCQ, pp. 341–344, 2004.
72. T. Ahn, S. Ryu, and I. Han, “The impact of web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing,” Information & Management, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 263–275, 2007.
73. H. Treiblmaier and A. Pinterits, “Developing metrics for web sites,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2010.
74. L. Hasan and E. Abuelrub, “Assessing the quality of web sites,” Applied Computing and Informatics,
75. vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 11–29, 2011.
76. M. Thelwall, “A layered approach for investigating the topological structure of communities in the web,” Journal of Documentation, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 410–429, 2003.
77. S. J. Koyanl, R. W. Balley, and J. R. Nall, Research-based Web design and usability guidelines. National Cancer Institute, 2004.
78. F. Carlos, G. Raquel, and O. Carlos, “The relevance of web design for the website success: A heuristic analysis,” University of Zaragoza, 2008.
79. W. Huang and X. Wang, “Lund university website evaluation: Focus on homepage and english research pages,” Master’s thesis, Lund University, Sweden, 2009.
80. L. Olsina, D. Godoy, G. Lafuente, and G. Rossi, “Assessing the quality of academic websites: A case study,” New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 81–103, 1999.
81. R. Agarwal and V. Venkatesh, “Assessing a firm’s web presence: A heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability,” Information Systems Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 168–186, 2002.
82. J. W. Palmer, “Web site usability, design, and performance metrics,” Information Systems Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 151–167, 2002.
83. U. Konradt, H. Wandke, B. Balazs, and T. Christophersen, “Usability in online shops: Scale construction, validation and the influence on the buyers’ intention and decision,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 165–174, 2003.
84. M. O. Leavitt and B. Shneiderman, Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines. US Department of Health and Human Services Washington, DC, 2006.
85. O. Rababah and T. Hamtini, “Causal interrelations among e-business website quality factors,” Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 137–158, 2010.
86. D. Gehrke and E. Turban, “Determinants of successful website design: Relative importance and recommendations for effectiveness,” in Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 1999.
87. Y. W. Lee, D. M. Strong, B. K. Kahn, and R. Y. Wang, “Aimq: A methodology for information quality assessment,” Information & Management, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 133–146, 2002.
88. I. Singh and A. Sook, “An evaluation of the usability of south african university web sites,” in Proceedings of the 2002 CITTE Conference, 2002, durban, South Africa.
89. L. Rosenfeld and P. Morville, Information Architecture for the World Wide Web, 2nd ed. Sebastopol, CA, USA: O’Reilly & Associates, Inc., 2002.
90. S. Beck, “Evaluation criteria: The good, the bad & the ugly: Or, why it’sa good idea to evaluate web sources,” http://lib.nmsu.edu/instruction/eval.html, 1997, recipient of the Links2Go Award.
91. X. Zhu and S. Gauch, “Incorporating quality metrics in centralized/distributed information retrieval on the world wide web,” in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Athens, Greece: ACM, 2000, pp. 288–295.
92. K. Beck, Test-driven development: By example. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2003.
93. R. Fitzpatrick, “Additional quality factors for the world wide web.” in Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress for Software Quality, Yokohama. Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers, Tokyo, 2000.
94. C. Liu and K. P. Arnett, “Exploring the factors associated with web site success in the context of electronic commerce,” Information & Management, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 2000.
95. A. Srivihok, “An assessment tool for electronic commerce: End user evaluation of web commerce sites,” Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Tech. Rep., 2000.
96. B. J. Fogg, J. Marshall, O. Laraki, A. Osipovich, C. Varma, N. Fang, J. Paul, A. Rangnekar, J. Shon, P. Swani et al., “What makes web sites credible?: A report on a large quantitative study,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2001, pp. 61–68.
97. S. J. Barnes and R. T. Vidgen, “Assessing the quality of auction web sites,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2001, pp. 10–pp.
98. ——, “An integrative approach to the assessment of e-commerce quality,” Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 114–127, 2002.
99. M. Cao and Q. Zhang, “Evaluating e-commerce web site design: A customer’s perspective,” in Proceedings of Decision Sciences Institute 2002 Annual Meeting, 2002, pp. 1186–1191.
100. N. Madeja and D. Schoder, “Designed for success-empirical evidence on features of corporate web pages,” in Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2003, pp. 10–pp.
101. J. Choudrie, G. Ghinea, and V. Weerakkody, “Evaluating global e-government sites: A view using web diagnostics tools,” Electronic Journal of E-Government, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 105–114, 2004.
102. I. A. Kokkinaki, S. Mylonas, and S. Mina, “Egovernment initiatives in cyprus,” E-Government Workshop (eGOV05) of the Brunel University, UK, 2005.
103. F. A. Mendo, “The evolution of smes web sites in the uk,” in Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering. IEEE, 2005, pp. 294–297.
104. M. A. E. Lautenbach, I. E. Ter Schegget, A. E. Schoute, and C. L. M. Witteman, “Evaluating the usability of web pages: A case study,” Artificial Intelligence Preprint Series, vol. 11, 2008.
105. ISO/IEC, “Iso/iec-14598-3:1998 information technology – software product evaluation - part 3: Process for developers,” 2002, international Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission.
106. ——, “Iso/iec fcd 9126-1.2: 1998 information technology - software product quality, part 1–quality model: Draft,” 1998, international Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission.
107. C. N. Madu and A. A. Madu, “Dimensions of e-quality,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 246–258, 2002.
108. U. M. Dholakia and L. L. Rego, “What makes commercial web pages popular? an empirical investigation of web page effectiveness,” European Journal of Marketing, vol. 32, no. 7/8, pp. 724–736, 1998.
109. Y. Lee and K. A. Kozar, “Investigating the effect of website quality on e-business success: An analytic hierarchy process (ahp) approach,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1383–1401, 2006.
110. W. H. Delone and E. R. Mclean, “Measuring e-commerce success: Applying the delone & mclean information systems success model,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 31–47, 2004.
111. M. Singh, A. Costtabile, and S. Paull, “E-commerce and customer relationship management (ecrm),” Melbourne: Heidelberg Press, pp. 95–108, 2001.
112. K. Krauss, “Testing an e-government website quality questionnaire: A pilot study,” in Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on World Wide Web Applications (WWW2003), 2003.
113. M. Cao, Q. Zhang, and J. Seydel, “B2c e-commerce web site quality: An empirical examination,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 645–661, 2005.
114. E. T. Loiacono, R. T. Watson, and D. L. Goodhue, “Webqual: An instrument for consumer evaluation
115. of web sites,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 51–87, 2007.
116. R. U. Bilsel, G. Büyüközkan, and D. Ruan, “A fuzzy preference-ranking model for a quality evaluation of hospital web sites,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1181–1197, 2006.
117. P. Vijayan and B. Shanmugam, “Service quality evaluation of internet banking in malaysia,” The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1970.
118. D. Gefen, E. Karahanna, and D. W. Straub, “Trust and tam in online shopping: An integrated model,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 51–90, 2003.
119. F.-J. Lin, K. Huarng, Y.-M. Chen, and S.-M. Lin, “Quality evaluation of web services,” in E-Commerce Technology for Dynamic E-Business, 2004. IEEE International Conference. IEEE, 2004, pp. 226–233.
120. A. Abanumy, A. Al-Badi, and P. Mayhew, “E-government website accessibility: In-depth evaluation of saudi arabia and oman,” The Electronic Journal of E-Government, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 99–106, 2005.
121. C. Okello-Obura, “Assessment of quality of east african governments websites and support to smes in business information provision,” Library Philosophy and Practice, 2015, paper 1213.
122. L. Olsina, “Metodología cuantitativa para la evaluación y comparación de la calidad de sitios web,” Ph.D. dissertation, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina, 1999.
123. Minerva Group, Quality principles for cultural websites: A handbook. Rome, Italy: La Tipografia, 2005.
124. J. E. Heimlich and K. Wang, “Evaluating the structure of web sites,” Environmental Education and Training Partnership Resource Library, Ohio State University Extension, 1999, USA.
125. M. Singh and J. Fisher, “Electronic commerce issues: A discussion of two exploratory studies,” in Proceedings of the Electronic 3rd Annual Conference on Electronic Commerce, 1999, victoria University, New Zealand.
126. X. Zhang, K. B. Keeling, and R. J. Pavur, “Information quality of commericial web site home pages: An explorative analysis,” in Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems, 2000, pp. 164–175.
127. A. Basu, “Context-driven assessment of commercial web sites,” in Proceedings of the 35th HawaiiInternational Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2002.
128. W. Chung and J. Paynter, “An evaluation of internet banking in new zealand,” in Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2002, pp. 2410–2419.
129. H. Achour and N. Bensedrine, “An evaluation of internet banking and online brokerage in tunisia,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on E-Business and E-learning, 2005, pp. 147–158, Amman, Jordan.
130. J. Chanaron, “Evaluating e-learning: The case of automative small-medium suppliers,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on e-Business and E-learning, 2005, pp. 13–25, amman, Jordan.
131. H.-Y. T. Ma and P. Zaphiris, “The usability and content accessibility of the e-government in the UK,” in Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction International Conference, 2003, Greece.
132. B. Yoo and N. Donthu, “Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of an internet shopping site (sitequal),” Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–45, 2001.
133. S. Yoo and J. Jin, “Evaluation of the home page of the top 100 university websites,” Academy of Information and Management Sciences, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 57–69, 2004.
134. N. Shedroff, “Recipe for a successful web site,” http://nathan.com/recipe-for-a-successful-website/, 1997.
135. B. J. Fogg, J. Marshall, A. Osipovich, C. Varma, O. Laraki, N. Fang, J. Paul, A. Rangnekar, J. Shon, P. Swani et al., “Elements that affect web credibility: Early results from a self-report study,” in Proceedings of CHI’00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2000, pp. 287–288.
136. M. Y. Ivory and M. A. Hearst, “Improving web site design,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 56–63, 2002.
137. H. Hussin, A. S. Mohd, and M. Mustafa, “E-commerce and ethical web design: Applying the bbbonline guidelines on malaysian websites,” The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 219–227, 2005.
Review
For citations:
Abduganiev S.G. Website Quality Evaluation Methodology Universal Star: 1st point – “Content”. Informatics. 2020;17(3):95-112. https://doi.org/10.37661/1816-0301-2020-17-3-95-112
Views: 1280
Email this article 